Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Although the Court of Appeal never suggests this analysis, the case invites comparison with sufficiency cases in which the principle of an inventive concept derived from the specification can have a general application across a claim.This Kat notices that the composition of the Court of Appeal again yokes together two specialist intellectual property judges (Lords Justices Floyd and Lewison) in the panel of three (the other member of the court being Lord Justice Longmore), and that both… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
This is because, like all keen IP bloggers, they are in a state of perpetual catch-up: the moment we take time off to read a piece of news, give it some thought and then write it up, something else suddenly crops up while we're not looking. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Floyd Abrams previews this month’s oral arguments in McCullen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:32 pm
In McCullen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:54 am
state level. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
The case is captioned Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Just the previous week Lord Justice Floyd, who gave the leading judgment in this decision, gave the Herschel Smith Lecture. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York – to appear on her own behalf in order to seek reconsideration of the Second Circuit’s decision to reassign the case of Floyd v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 4:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:07 pm
The case is Ligon/Floyd v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That this should be necessary demonstrates the dysfunctional state of the SPC system at present. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Landis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
