Search for: "Foley & Lardner"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
During our recently concluded thought leader interview series, I had intended to line up at least one more interview – with Adam Losey, president and editor-in-chief of IT-Lex.org, a technology law not-for-profit educational and literary organization and an attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
During our recently concluded thought leader interview series, I had intended to line up at least one more interview – with Adam Losey, president and editor-in-chief of IT-Lex.org, a technology law not-for-profit educational and literary organization and an attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:11 pm
Stevens of Foley & Lardner, and Colin G. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
Note-David Simon is a partner at Foley and Lardner and Bill Athanas is a partner at Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 9:21 pm
Stevens of Foley & Lardner will provide guidance for patent counsel on identifying and determining inventorship and will offer best practices for correcting errors regarding inventorship. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
Stevens of Foley & Lardner, and Colin G. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:17 am
[1] The authors are attorneys at Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:04 am
Many thanks to Foley & Lardner for hosting. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 8:48 pm
Special thanks to Foley & Lardner’s Max Lin for summarizing the Draft regulations. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
Then see this article by Antoinette Konski of Foley & Lardner for JDSupra. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
In this session, Brian Lynch with IntApp moderated a panel comprising speakers from Foley & Lardner, Holland & Knight, and Sidley Austin who reviewed legal hold requirements and discussed methods firms can use manage holds. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:44 am
Below you can link directly to articles of interest.The Ins and Outs of Sourcing by Lisa Gianakos, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLPUnderstanding the Value of Your Alumni by Sharnon Melt Abrahams, Foley and Lardner LLP; Sarah Finesberg-Lombardi, Select-Mind, Inc.; Jennifer Young, Foley and Lardner, LLPPrepping Your Team for the Playoffs by Patrick Fuller, LawVision Group and Linda Will, Thompson & Knight, LLPTotal Library Service… [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 9:25 pm
Our next webinar features a panel comprising speakers from Foley & Lardner, Holland & Knight, and Sidley Austin and will review litigation hold requirements and discuss methods firms can use manage litigation holds. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:14 pm
But Scott Fredericksen, the managing partner of Foley & Lardner’s Washington office, said his firm has had more experience with weather-related closures than most firms. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 6:33 am
We're pleased to announce our latest event, scheduled for Monday, November 26th in the offices of Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:29 pm
Samantha Green is joined by special guests Adam Losey, e-Discovery Attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP; Joshua Gilliland of the Bowtie Law Blog; Benita Sumey, Associate Legal Director at Orrick; and Linda Baynes, Discovery Analytics & Review Services Associate Operations Director at Orrick. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson and Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest developments affecting investment advisers, hedge funds, and mutual funds. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Cybersecurity Posts and Articles: Foley & Lardner's Privacy & Security Source Blog has an excellent post, "Appellate Court Decision Demonstrates that Security is Not Just About Technology -- It's About People. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
Click here for the complete Foley & Lardner publication. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:42 pm
A panel consisting of Robert Bahr, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, USPTO; Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner LLP; and Kurtis MacFerrin of Google, Inc. will discuss the final rules and when a patent holder would be well advised to ask for supplemental examination, balancing the risks and benefits. [read post]
