Search for: "GENUINE PARTS COMPANY CORPORATION"
Results 521 - 540
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Dumb Starbucks is not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:08 pm
Many Koreans feel it is natural to protest as part of their newfound freedom. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
And in considering those claims, the fact that the companies are for-profit enterprises, or corporations, may well be relevant, whether or not they are determinative threshold considerations. 5. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:26 pm
One alternative that would go a long way would be to foster a genuinely competitive market for Internet access. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
But the second part of his sentence is 100% wrong. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2013 SCC 58; and Infineon Technologies AG v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
Ajax Electric Motor Corp., 88 NY2d 582 (1996), New York’s highest court enforced a voting agreement in a family-owned corporation, the recited purpose of which was “to provide for continuity in the control and management of [the company]. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am
The company’s investment in and control over its import distribution network, of which the warehouses are a part, “is a critically important corporate strategy for Walmart,” the retailer acknowledged. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
There is a genuine issue of material fact only if the evidence presented "when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, [is] sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of the non-moving party." [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:45 pm
In some cases corporations are formed just to own all the IP that a company or group of companies may have. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
In a free society, public officials should never engage in surveillance in order to punish their political enemies; to restrict freedom of speech or religion; to suppress legitimate criticism and dissent; to help their preferred companies or industries; to provide domestic companies with an unfair competitive advantage; or to benefit or burden members of groups defined in terms of religion, ethnicity, race, and gender. 4. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:34 am
Later, it shifted to an explanation of poor performance and bad behavior on the part of the employee as reasons for her termination. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:18 pm
Another corporate officer fired plaintiff.Here is why the Court of Appeals (Koeltl [D.J.] and Lohier) reverses summary judgment on the retaliation claim:1.While someone else made the decision to fire plaintiff, the fact that she complained to a corporate officer about discrimination is enough to show the company knew about her protected activity. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
Disputed facts precluded summary judgment as well on the employer’s contention that it was entitled to a set-off from potential damages because the employee had violated her duty of loyalty by stealing and misusing confidential corporate documents and misusing a company laptop. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Accordingly he identifies four separate categories of reader: (i) entrepreneurs and engineers who until now had no way of judging how good their patents are; (ii) patent lawyers and agents looking for a concentration of live cases where specific drafting created (or failed to create) valuable patents; (iii) corporate executives, corporate board members and patent brokers, contemplating the purchase or sale of patent portfolios, and finally (iv) investment advisers, equity… [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Attorney's fees -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Non-final orders -- An order finding entitlement to attorney's fees but not setting an amount is a non-final, non-appealable order -- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdictionKLING CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
Without a doubt, there is merit to the professors' case, although I bristle at the letter's broad-brush statements and overt stance that is pro-large-corporate-entity. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:47 am
Part XXIII.I of the Ontario Securities Act provides a statutory cause of action for a company’s misrepresentations in its continuous disclosure documents. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:02 pm
There are major corporations that do this and small truck-farms that do this. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
In the UK, Croner, presently part of Wolters Kluwer and sister company to CCH, though not a law firm, is a significant provider of employment litigation services. [read post]
