Search for: "Gardner v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
The Supreme Court has just handed down its decision in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
"Commenting that the statute does not limit examinations to certain types of employees or duties, and has been applied to non-teaching personnel, citing Gardner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
  ""[A]n attorney-client relationship may exist in the absence of a retainer or fee" (Gardner v Jacon, 148 AD2d 794, 795) and, "[i]n determining the existence of an attorney-client relationship, a court must look to the actions of the parties to ascertain the existence of such a relationship" (Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380, lv denied 99 NY2d 501; see McLenithan v McLenithan, 273 AD2d 757, 758-759). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
  But there is a persuasive Ninth Circuit case, Gardner v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
Barnet stated that this was not surprising as the document referred to procdure once a decision as to s.17 or s.20 duty had been made, and it was the s.17 document. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:31 am
In the Wall Street Journal (10/21) Health Blog, Jacob Goldstein wrote, "The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has come out against the drug industry in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:14 pm by Matthew Gardner
Basically, a good summary of the theory stated by the Missouri Court of Appeals in Gardner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Gardner & Guidone, Inc., we held that a defendant is entitled to attorney fees for defending an injunction if he prevails at a later hearing or otherwise ultimately wins the case. 164 Ind. [read post]