Search for: "Garland v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 10:43 pm by Mark Tushnet
Maybe Super's objections to an Article V convention are well-taken. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Another preview comes from Shelby Garland and Jonathan Kim at Cornell. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by John Elwood
In the wake of that decision, the United States has filed a brief asking that the court grant review in one of those cases, Garland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Constitution guaranteed that every state would have two Senators regardless of population, and immunized the states’ equal representation in the Senate from the ordinary process of amendment in Article V, requiring each state to consent to changing its equal representation in the Senate. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm by Colter Paulson and Trane Robinson
ATF, the Sixth Circuit resorted to the rule of lenity instead of Chevron deference to resolve an ambiguity in favor of the private citizen by deciding that a semi-automatic gun equipped with a bump stock is not a machine gun—the same ruling the Supreme Court recently reached in Garland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
High court should step in against law regulating speech regarding ballot measures by small, low-budget groups [John Kramer, Institute for Justice on Justice v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Casetext, David Boyle considers how the court’s 2015 opinion in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (right, credit), summarizing and quoting the conclusions drawn by New York University Professor David Garland in his just-published book, Peculiar Institution: America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition.In the same review, Stevens restated his own conclusion, which he had announced in his opinion in Baze v. [read post]