Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 521 - 540 of 864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:05 am by Dan Bressler
General Motors Corp.: the relationship between the attorney and the former client, the time between the cases, the size of the firm, the nature of the disqualified attorney’s involvement in the case and the timing of the ‘wall.'” [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
General Motors Corp., where “the ‘commercial custom’ of celebrity endorsements in television commercials created an issue of fact as to whether the defendant’s commercial implied the celebrity plaintiff’s endorsement of its product,” or Downing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Then 1973 rolled around and all of a sudden General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors… the Big 4, if you can remember that far back… all seemed terribly out of step with what was going on in the world. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
If the lawyer is both lawyer and businessperson, is she providing legal advice to the corporation in the form of herself as the corporate decision-maker? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
General Motors Corp., 977 F.2d 369, 372 (7th Cir. 1992) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:41 pm by Daniel S. Blynn
Crunch San Diego, LLC, 904 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 2018)] as a device that stores numbers to be called, irrespective of whether they have been generated by a random or sequential number generator. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:52 am by Jack Howell
Enhanced deduction for corporate contributions of computer equipment for educational purposes under Code Sec. 170(e)(6)(G). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:49 am by emagraken
 4: I do not subscribe to the view that if there is no motor vehicle damage then there is no injury. [read post]