Search for: "General Motors, LLC. " Results 521 - 540 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ITC Law Blog)   US General - Decisions District Court N D Illinois: No equitable estoppel where parties never communicated: Integrated Cards, LLC v McKillips Indus., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Patent Reform Chairman Leahy announces ‘tentative agreement in principle’ on Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (Patently-O) (IAM) Patent reform is so NOT sexy, it hurts... [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ITC Law Blog)   US General - Decisions District Court N D Illinois: No equitable estoppel where parties never communicated: Integrated Cards, LLC v McKillips Indus., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Patent Reform Chairman Leahy announces ‘tentative agreement in principle’ on Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (Patently-O) (IAM) Patent reform is so NOT sexy, it hurts... [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 3:59 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[ii] It was a new experience for me to try a criminal case involving motor-vehicular homicide. [read post]
This past week, several consumer actions made headlines: Hyundai and Kia Set State Attorneys General Investigations for $42.1 Million Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Motor Corp. have agreed to pay $42.1 million to settle claims by the Attorneys General of 33 states and the District of Columbia that the companies misrepresented mileage and fuel economy ratings for certain vehicles. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:28 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The EEOC provided the rationale the NLRB used in its General Motors decision, Fishman says. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Hyundai Motor America, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D California: False marking affirmative defenses – Laches & unclean hands are in, advice of Counsel is out: Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:59 am
Jack Miller - General Motors Asset Management Many partnerships are too small to have their own marketing staff and rely on third party PA’s to introduce them to investors. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:01 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Overhauser Law Offices LLC, the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign patent searches, patent applications and assists with enforcing patents via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:48 am by Cari Rincker
This is not true for sole proprietorships and general partnerships. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm by corey
Morano, Esq. at 201-598-5019 at The Morano Law Firm, LLC or email us at newjerseylawyernow@gmail.com and we can set up a free consultation to clear your record today! [read post]