Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 521 - 540 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by INFORRM
For full text, please visit Data Protection Day: guaranteeing individuals’ privacy rights, Commission, DG Justice, Press Release – 28 Jan 2011. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
[A] decidedly anti-patent core nucleus from the Douglas era is reforming at the Court that - save for Justice Stevens - had disappeared in the wake of the 1980 Chakrabarty and 1981 Diehr decisions . . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
And you are also saying that the Patent Office is out of control, not through its own fault, but there are too few people and too many inventions. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(Under Connecticut rules, motions to unseal generally go right up to the Appellate Court, rather than to the court that did the sealing.) [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Larry was Justice Lewis Powell’s law clerk in 1972-73 when Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
Starting in the 1980s, he represented the NRA in numerous cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
I have given a general explanation of the field tests here before. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
And while abortion is generally a very safe procedure, later abortions are more dangerous than earlier ones.Constitutional Protection for AbortionTo understand the extreme nature of these recent bans, we need to consider briefly the existing constitutional protection for abortion.In 1973, the Supreme Court held in Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
Further, William Kovacic—a former FTC chair, commissioner, and general counsel—explains that the unanimous Supreme Court opinion in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Elio Fiorucci went all the way up to the Grand Chamber of theCourt of Justice of the European Union, which gave judgment this morning. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
The Commonwealth petitioned a single justice of this court arguing that the motion judge erred, as a matter of law, in granting the defendant’s motion. [read post]