Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:36 am
… But now the logic of the situation led [the house of Hapsburg] to be the pattern of a pluralistic and tolerant society.' In the final decades of the Hapsburg empire, one nationality after another turned its back on the empire, including, finally, the Austro-Germans, who adopted a national, indeed völkisch, identification as Germans. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
German IP blogs. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
United States, 422 F.2d 874, 878 (Ct. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:21 am
Well over a year since the United States Patent and Trademark Office upheld a few claims of Apple's "rubberbanding" (or "overscroll bounceback") U.S. patent, the European version of that patent has come under massive pressure. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
EIS, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am
We just don't know yet.Here's the U.S. complaint:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22121278-22-07-25-pfizer-biontech-dj-non-infr-complaint-v-curevacCureVac's German complaint is not seeking an injunction--just fair compensation. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Debtor otherwise has no assets in the United States, is not a party to any lawsuits pending in the United States, and is not believed to be currently residing in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am
For example, also German procedural law provides for a flat-rate system. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Russell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:20 am
However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that there are serious divergences in the application of supposedly uniformed European law in various member states – in particular in Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.On the nature of the obligations, the Karlsruhe appeals courts appears to be stricter than its British and Dutch counterparts. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
The Court rendered a decision in 2011, Mosley v The United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 774 (10 May 2011). [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court has announced a revised standard for an important aspect of corporate litigation: the analysis of pre-suit demand futility for purposes of pursuing a derivative stockholder claim, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
But the court was not convinced, noting that “the fact that a person outside the United States may be a `whistleblower’ under Dodd-Frank does not compel the conclusion he is protected by the Anti-Retaliation Provision. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
German v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am
The question is whether the United States is politically and militarily prepared to dig in for a 10- or 20-year campaign. [read post]
