Search for: "Give Something Back, Inc." Results 521 - 540 of 1,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
  This alleged self-dealing harmed workers by diverting money that would have gone into their retirement plans to the company’s bottom line.Then Allen Gouse, the trustee of the 401(K) plan at the Greater Hartford Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center, Inc., in Connecticut, read the fine print and figured out something was wrong. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:33 am by Ben
Miller is trying to use the provision in US copyright law that allows authors to terminate a grant of rights and reclaim ownership, giving him back Friday the 13th. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indeed, under the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
The Committee acknowledged that in this situation a certain amount of information about the case would need to be shared with potential funders to convince them to donate money, meaning that the client would need to give their informed consent. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:52 am by admin
by David Curle In order to agree to write about something that is 25 years old, you almost have to admit to being old enough to have something to say about it. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Zinke, 16-498, and (part credit; it’s a patent case) SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
Looking for a landmark ruling on patent exhaustion, the patent community got just that in the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
The injury in fact should be “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical” (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
., Inc., 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926), applies with the utmost force to the President himself. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
But anyway, I’m not suggesting that Gorsuch is a slouch or something. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michael Maschke, CEO of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
As a consequence, even going back into the distant past yields few precedents of accounts of profits in trade mark cases. [read post]