Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon" Results 521 - 540 of 2,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:55 am by Thomas Long
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that there was no indication that the award was procured through fraud or dishonesty, or that any other basis for overturning the award existed (Landau v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:40 pm by Dr. Virginia Cervieri
Virginia CervieriThe Uruguayan Criminal Court of First Instance Specialized in Organized Crime has ordered internet service providers (ISPs) to block websites that retransmit sporting events illegally, thereby infringing the copyright to this content (Fox International Channels v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Willis Van Devanter made perhaps the most famous statement of these powers in McGrain v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
No breach – after investigation 07454-18 Belcher v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach – after investigation 07446-18 Heppell v Bella, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 08062-18 Gordon v Sunday Life, 3 Harassment (2018), No breach – after investigation 07925-18 Partlett v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 00154-19… [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Annette Gordon-Reed makes sure legal history is part of HLS’s pre-orientation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Danforth, Cody Delistraty, Nikolas Gvosdev, Cherie Harder, Jason Kuznicki, Markos Moulitsas, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm by Erica Vaccarello
In Iancu v Brunetti, the USPTO argues for the permanence of the “immoral or scandalous” provision. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Carolina Pina
The court refers to the CJEU case C 251/95 SABEL BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport, 11 November 1997 to hold that the mere association which the public might make between two trademarks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]