Search for: "Grand Jury Witness, in Re"
Results 521 - 540
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association: Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our colleagues, friends, and… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
” Sullivan involved the issue of what the jury had considered in returning an indictment, and the concurring opinion produced the quote of the year: “Even if the hoary aphorism that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich were true, such a result should still make clear that the grand jury considered what the sandwich allegedly did. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:50 pm
” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 643 F.2d 226, 228 (5th Cir.1981). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
The fifth amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law… The sixth amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
Refusing to talk to a grand jury without use immunity is a reasonable stance for someone to take even if she thinks she hasn’t done anything wrong—especially where, as here, the grand jury’s investigation appears to have political overtones. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:13 pm
The rest, numbers three through twelve, were ratified and officially adopted into the Constitution on this date 220 years ago, December 15, 1791.The Bill of Rights.Before the day was over, we began eviscerating them.They're not altogether gone, of course. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
" The Court's decision was based, in part, on: the untruthful testimony of an FBI agent to the grand jury; the provision of false information in applications for search and seizure warrants; the improper review of e-mail communications between a defendant and her lawyer; the failure to comply with discovery obligations and other court rulings; and misrepresentations to the Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:10 am
McQueary's testimony to a grand jury -- in which Mr. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am
Report of the 1989- 90 Los Angeles County Grand Jury, June 26, 1990, at 69 [hereinafter “Grand Jury Report”]. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
Judge Matz [T]his Court is compelled to find that the Government team allowed a key FBI agent to testify untruthfully before the grand jury, inserted material falsehoods into affidavits submitted to magistrate judges in support of applications for search warrants and seizure warrants, improperly reviewed e-mail communications between one Defendant and her lawyer, recklessly failed to comply with its discovery obligations, posed questions to certain witnesses in violation… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
The hearing is a military procedure similar to a grand jury hearing, whereby prosecutors will lay out their evidence before a judge who will determine if the case is sufficiently strong for the young private to be court-martialed. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
So it is with deep regret that this Court is compelled to find that the Government team allowed a key FBI agent to testify untruthfully before the grand jury, inserted material falsehoods into affidavits submitted to magistrate judges in support of applications for search warrants and seizure warrants, improperly reviewed e-mail communications between one Defendant and her lawyer, recklessly failed to comply with its discovery obligations, posed questions to certain… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
On November 17, 2009, DEA agents arrested Olson and three others on federal drug charges; on November 19, the grand jury returned an indictment against them. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
No one can say for sure, of course, since grand jury proceedings are highly secretive affairs. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
They're heroes. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
It is very similar to the account summarized in the 23-page grand jury presentment. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
For now, a little background: In the federal system and most states that use the grand-jury system, grand juries typically unveil their criminal allegations against someone in an indictment or a criminal complaint. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:50 am
They are screened by systematic desensitization techniques (many are detailed in the Grand Jury report). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
Independent, third-party, adult witnesses who have already testified under oath in front of a grand jury!! [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
He's a Witness. [read post]
