Search for: "Graves v. Powers" Results 521 - 540 of 1,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 9:11 am by S
Moreover, as this was a second appeal, the test for adducing fresh evidence was far stricter, i.e. there must be a risk of injustice so grave as to overbear the pressing claims of finality in litigation and the fresh evidence must demonstrate that there is a powerful probability that such a result has been perpetrated. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:11 am by S
Moreover, as this was a second appeal, the test for adducing fresh evidence was far stricter, i.e. there must be a risk of injustice so grave as to overbear the pressing claims of finality in litigation and the fresh evidence must demonstrate that there is a powerful probability that such a result has been perpetrated. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
Related PostsMay 20, 2010 -- Right to Learn: Daly on Patronage and power relations in public education: the case of Protestant schools (0)May 7, 2010 -- Primary Schools and Religious Patronage: Democracy or Demographics? [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by David M. Driesen
In the general workplace case, NFIB v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Legal Context To the Framers of the Constitution, the king’s appointment power was “the most insidious and powerful weapon of eighteenth century despotism,” one that the king used to appoint “‘miniature infinitesimal Deities’” to spread the “weeds of tyranny” across the colonies. [read post]