Search for: "Gray v. District Court"
Results 521 - 540
of 965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Supreme Court’s decision June 2010 in Skilling v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Gray v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
This is a direct appeal of the trial court's ruling on a motion for DNA testing filedin the 31st Judicial District Court of Gray County, Cause No. 5216, styled The State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:20 pm
While the appeal was pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court the United States Supreme Court ruled in Gray v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
Rick Perry, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Gray County District Attorney Lynn Switzer. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Section 2259 provides that a district court “shall order restitution for any offense under this chapter. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Second, the same sensitive information concerns are raised when appellate courts remand enemy combatant habeas corpus petitions to district courts; thus, the Supreme Court effectively decided in Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:47 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm
Serius Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
ITC (Maier & Maier) Theft of trade secrets from Dow, Cargill by Kexue Huang (IPBiz) US Patent Reform The disharmonious loss of the Hilmer doctrine (Pharma Patents) Post grant dead zone coming soon (Patents Post-Grant) America Invents Act: New opportunities for challenging the validity of US patents (PatLit) AIA overview: Changes to inter partes re-examination (Patent Docs) AIA Overview: Post-grant review provisions (Patent Docs) AIA Overview: Prior user rights defense (Patent Docs) … [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
AND JAYNE MERRITT v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm
Ropes & Gray, from Am Law Daily:Ropes & Gray moved late Monday in Boston federal district court to have two of nine counts contained in an employment discrimination suit filed against the firm by former associate John Ray III dismissed. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
– Virginia District Court awards damages of US$919 million for trade secret misappropriation: Kolon Industries v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
See, e.g., Gray-Bey v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Hulu, LLC (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Use of the terms ‘charge’ ‘recharger’ and ‘connector’ do not render claim indefinite: Intermec Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
See, e.g., Gray-Bey v. [read post]
