Search for: "HALE v. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 1,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2015, 2:03 am by Marguerite Kenner, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
  Lady Hale supported Lord Kerr’s dissenting analysis For judgment, please download: [2015] UKSC 2 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  (See Hale, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1383-1384; see generally Adams v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Lady Hale, giving the leading judgment, firmly stated that “the immediately striking thing about this case is how much hard work has to be done in order to find that a member of an LLP is not a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the 1996 Act. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
In the interview, Lady Hale also stated her view on prenuptial agreements and stuck by her decision from Radmacher v Granatino in 2010 in which she was the only judge out of the nine-judge panel to oppose enforcing the prenuptial agreement which was the subject matter of the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Eagle v Chambers The reference to Eagle v Chambers (above) is of particular interest of course because the judgment of the Court of Appeal in that case was delivered by Lady Justice Hale (as she then was). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
 She stated that, to the extent LLP had committed such defaults, it had done so “on behalf of” Paragon. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
The mortgage application form stated that the house was being purchased on a “buy to let” basis, with vacant possession and that all tenancies granted would be for 6 months or less. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm by David Smith
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Anthony Fairclough
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm by Lucy Reed
See for example Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, pa 132, where Baroness Hale sums it up: “The 1998 Act does not create any new cause of action between private persons. [read post]