Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 1,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am by James Eckert
  The court noted that the issue was a novel one - whether there are limits to the increases a state can make to the severity of punishments for possessing weapons - but chose not to address it beyond saying that without strict scrutiny, the defendant could not prevail, and this was an intermediate scrutiny issue.People v Hughes is important because the Court of Appeals upheld the Appellate Division decision that defendant's purported CPL 330 motion was sufficient to… [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
In two decisions from the Second Department last Tuesday (Hughes v Webb, 2007 NY Slip Op 04597 and Langhorne v County of Nassau, 2007 NY Slip Op 04602), the Court held that evidence of the "permanence" of particular injuries fall outside of the rule. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by David Spence
” About six months after the Court handed down its decision upholding Order 745, the Court also decided Hughes v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
Mr Ver was represented by Iain Wilson and Tom Double of Brett Wilson LLP and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Ian Helme of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm
If you live, as I do, in southern California, you are surrounded by USC alums and supporters. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
The classic floodgates argument found favour with Lord Hughes, at least to the extent that he would have confined art 3, absent alleged state complicity, to a duty to have effective systems in place to deal with art 3 ill-treatment (which he found had been breached in any event). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
  In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaIn a seven-page complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, five police officers have sued The Chicago Sun-Times for publishing photo lineups that depicted the officers and included personal information gleaned from the Secretary of State's motor vehicle records.The complaint, Scott Dahlstrom, Hugh Gallagly, Peter Kelly, Robert Shea & Emmet Welch v. [read post]