Search for: "Hale v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
Thankfully, Lady Hale is not alone in openly questioning the government’s cuts to legal aid, stating that they will “of course, have a disproportionate effect upon the poorest and most vulnerable in society…”. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am by Katharine Lammiman
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:19 am by Lisa Baird
The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Bauman holds that personal jurisdiction existed over DaimlerChrysler Aktiengellschaft (DCAG), a German company, because DCAG maintained the right to control its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (MBUSA), such that DCAG could be haled into court in California due to MBUSA’s contacts with that state. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Larry Ribstein
FN 176:  See United States v Kordel, 397 US 1 (1970); Hale v Henkel, 201 US 43 (1906) (reasoning that the corporation was a separate entity for Fifth Amendment purposes although not for purposes of applying the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, in 2010, the state of South Australia sought to prosecute ‘Mr P’ for two rapes of his then wife in 1963 (R v P, GA (2010) 109 SASR 1). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, in 2010, the state of South Australia sought to prosecute ‘Mr P’ for two rapes of his then wife in 1963 (R v P, GA (2010) 109 SASR 1). [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm by Florian Mueller
The same law firms (Irell & Manella for Fortress/VLSI, and Wilmer Hale for Intel and, in California, also for Apple) are working on the infringement cases as well as the antitrust action.Here's the complete verdict form:21-03-02 VLSI v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]