Search for: "Heath v. Heath" Results 521 - 540 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
Joining the majority of European courts, the Paris Court of Justice ruled that Eli Lilly’s patent, which relates to the combined administration of pemetrexed disodium and vitamin B12, was infringed by the marketing of Fresenius’ pemetrexed diacid. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:06 am by Laurence Lai
Laurence LaiThe European Patent Office has today published an advance preview of its annual update to the Guidelines for Examination which will come into force on 1 November 2019. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
The government's two religious accommodationsAs some of you may know, the Executive branch has provided two types of religious accommodations to nonprofit employers that object to the HHS Preventive Heath Services Rule:First, some such employers--primarily, churches and their auxiliaries--are exempt altogether from the requirement that they include contraceptive coverage if they offer a health-insurance plan to their employees. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
  That’s what Heath Haussamen, editor and publisher of NMPolitics.net, did after the New Mexico Spaceport Authority in 2017 refused to hand over basic public records related to the private companies that lease real estate at Spaceport America, the much-publicized commercial launchpad just outside Truth or Consequences, N.M. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
  That’s what Heath Haussamen, editor and publisher of NMPolitics.net, did after the New Mexico Spaceport Authority in 2017 refused to hand over basic public records related to the private companies that lease real estate at Spaceport America, the much-publicized commercial launchpad just outside Truth or Consequences, N.M. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
  They have suggested, however, that the law must have a very different practical effect than I surmised because, if I were correct, then most employers would be dropping their health insurance plans—something that is not happening and that the government does not expect to happen anytime soon.My correspondents are of course correct about their factual premise:  Some large employers will drop their employee heath insurance plans in response to the ACA, but most will not. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
Haywards Heath, West Sussex : Bloomsbury Professional, 2012 xliv, 380 p. ; 25 cm. [read post]