Search for: "Hedges v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 5:00 am
Lehman salespeople also alerted favored hedge funds. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Reyes: Defining Prosecutorial Misconduct - This post outlines United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm
Stoyas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:40 am
Yesterday, Yale lawprof Jack Balkin had to backtrack:As I suspected, Justice Scalia did not say he would have dissented in Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:10 am
In Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:32 pm
Take a look at Texport Oil Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
To uphold such a claim . . . would be to disregard the principles governing reissued patents, stated upon great consideration by this court at the last term in the case of Miller v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:08 am
Banc of America Securities, Case No. 05 Civ. 9016 (SAS), involves an action under both the federal securities and New York State laws by a group of investors seeking to recover more than a half billion dollars in losses alleged to have resulted from the liquidation of two hedge funds in which they were investors. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:35 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
Two Pending Cases Before the U.S. Supreme Court Could Substantially Impact New Jersey Employment Law
2 Feb 2024, 8:05 am
The appellant in Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:54 pm
Citing Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Hirsh, Marco V. [read post]
