Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 521 - 540 of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 6:06 am by Kiran Bhat
The Salem Statesman Journal covers last week’s decision in Premo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:38 am by Bruce Nye
" ancient precedent division, CBL reported in March on Leung v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Part of this voter legacy is Proposition 218, enacted in 1996 (California Constitution Art XIIID).The most recent 218 decision, Golden Hills Neighborhood Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Capitol Hill House Democrats’ “Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s America Act” (LIFT America Act) –containing $40 billion dedicated for broadband, largely through reverse auctions – remains pending. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Capitol Hill Negotiations on a second large COVID-19 relief legislation effectively broke down August 7. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm by Gordon Firemark
p=2278 Netflix Gets an Earful and Settles Suit with Deaf ViewersLawyers.com: http://blogs.lawyers.com/2012/10/netflix-gets-an-earful-and-settles-suit-with-deaf-viewers/Ruling on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: http://dredf.org/captioning/MJP-DENIED-JUDGE-PONSOR-ORDER-6-19-12.pdf ‘Dog’ Chapman Scores Big Legal Victory Against ‘Bounty Hunter’ Producer THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/dog-chapman-scores-big-legal-387379 National Conference of Personal… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Ct. 1145 (2002)........................................................ 5 Hill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
This, I think, is in some tension with the Court’s conclusion in Hill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Beverly Hills, CA, US 90210 Telephone: +1 (310) 275-6664 Fax: +1 (310) 550-1856 aldenlaw@yahoo.com Dennis Moore, Attorney at Law 5041 La Mart Dr., Ste 230 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 660-5289 Fax: (951) 340-3276 Mandelman out. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
Hill, 750 F.3d 982, 988 (8th Cir. 2014) (holding a jury could reasonably infer that a defendant's `intentional a [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
District Court in California recently addressed the validity of this discovery maneuver in the 2010 case of Crispin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Max Greenwood reports on Stevens’ proposal at The Hill. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:23 am by Florian Mueller
We're still going to see spats over who invented what--but even more critical than IP ownership is the gatekeeper role that the major platform makers and app store operators play.The Fortnite maker's two app store cases were processed by the Northern District of California's intra-district assignment system, which simply picks the next available slot:Epic Games v. [read post]