Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman" Results 521 - 540 of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Auth. v Gorrick, 2010 NY Slip Op 03044, Decided on April 15, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Transit Authority sued Philbert Gorrick, its former employee, in connection with Gorrick’s “admittedly fraudulent misrepresentation of earnings in an affidavit executed for the express purpose of inducing the Transit Authority to pay him more than $100,000 in back pay after he was successful in obtaining an arbitration award in a disability discrimination… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The courts’ willingness to enforce the public policy purposes underlying HESCA is evident in Hoffman v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:13 am
As background for this post, it might be helpful to read  Hoffman Plastics Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
There's a second issue regarding immigration status and remedies following the Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even accepting plaintiff’s contention that the law firm defendant breached the specific provision of the retainer agreement requiring “representation at closing” (see generally Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [2016]), plaintiff failed to establish that the breach was the [*2]proximate cause of the damages complained of – the cost to replace the roof of the property purchased. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:05 pm by Luke Gilman
The work in the clinics was headed up by Geoff Hoffman, a faculty supervisor in the University of Houston Immigration Clinic who serves as co-counsel, with oral argument to be handled by Sri Srinivasan, a veteran before the court who argued before the court earlier this year in another case with Houston ties – Skilling v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:44 pm
Jury deliberations began on Tuesday in San Francisco in Bowoto v. [read post]