Search for: "Holmes v. Powers"
Results 521 - 540
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Pell v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am
The IWL can help you. https://t.co/iT3uTLpwrw -> Possible to decide copyright infringement claims in arbitration, states High Court of Bombay https://t.co/jMZBfkBMzV -> TPP A healthy agreement – The Washington Post https://t.co/x1zHL5fSB9 -> Patent Protection for Scientific Discoveries: Sequenom, Mayo, and the Meaning of § 101 https://t.co/59YbFoMhWy -> Conference on the Global Digital Content Market Opens at WIPO https://t.co/oa4oBXFonZ -> Holmes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
I was looking at histories of civil liberty lawyering across territories that had been part of the British empire, most of my lawyers were engaged in resisting the powers of a variety of Emergency regimes, be it during anti-colonial wars of independence (Kenya, Malaysia, Cyprus); struggles of postcolonial state formation (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka), or during military occupation (postwar Europe). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The term of office and powers, including the power of voting on cases before the Supreme Court, of life tenured Supreme Court can no more be altered by statute than can be the term of office or powers of the President, the Vice President, Senators, or Representatives, or of any state elected officials. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Ofcom is assessing edition of This Morning after presenter Eamonn Holmes commented on conspiracy theories linking the rollout of 5G mobile technology with the coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
" Some of the signs bear much more disturbing messages such as "Resist Jewish Power," "Jewish Power Corrupts," and "No More Holocaust Movies. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
See Holmes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 55 (1963). 16 446 John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday 30 January 2018, in the case of Watson v Home Secretary ([2018] EWCA Civ 70) confirmed that section 1 of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 was inconsistent with EU in certain important respects. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Lynch, 834 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2016) (wrote opinion and concurred separately) “inadmissibility under one-year bar prevented aliens who entered country illegally more than once from obtaining adjustment of status, did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status” Gorsuch wrote a separate concurrence expressing his doubts about the doctrine of Chevron deference, which “permit[s] executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core judicial and… [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 6:46 am
Abram and Schmerber v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Practitioners were concerned that giving a court the removal power for any other reason would interfere with independent administration. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
James Bradley Thayer and Oliver Wendell Holmes would be proud. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Though there is a conflict of judicial opinion about the power of a court to grant anticipatory bail, the majority view is that there is no such power under the existing provisions of the Code. [read post]
