Search for: "House v. Close" Results 521 - 540 of 7,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2009, 3:30 pm by Venkat
There are plenty of established auction houses that regularly deal in domain names (e.g. [read post]
  The pole camera (1) took continuous video recording for approximately eight months, (2) focused on the driveway and the front of the house, (3) had the ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers, and (4) created a digitally searchable log. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:35 am by Kali Borkoski
  Kali Borkoski:  On June 26, the Court announced its decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The magistrate judge eventually closed out the case and approved the proposed settlement under the term sheet (and not the language in the drafts that went back and forth), as per the Second Circuit's procedures in Cheeks v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:31 am
Defendant stored a closed black bag at the house of another, and he showed a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Several areas on campus, including Aldrich Hall where the university’s administration is housed, were closed. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Google close to settling EU antitrust investigation – sources http://t.co/LnoJVMPpTA -> Canadian Government Tables 5 IP Treaties in the House of Commons http://t.co/xYl4PSZwRP -> Obama’s European Privacy Headache http://t.co/GmBZ8UPvdb -> Movie Studio Wants $869,000 From FileServe to Compensate Piracy Losses http://t.co/NjTHx892em -> Christian Louboutin: Lawsuits for Fashion http://t.co/UQkCNt3PG5 -> A Domain Name is Property. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
If the bill does become law, it might weigh on the pending case Severance v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am by INFORRM
In Sunderland Housing Group v Baines ([2006] EWHC 2359 (QB) however, Eady J held that the defendant’s assertion of an intention to justify needed to be scrutinised more closely, in circumstances where the Court is required to balance an applicant’s Article 8 rights with a defendant’s Article 10 ECHR right to freedom of expression. [read post]