Search for: "Howe v. People" Results 521 - 540 of 35,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
 Though I hardly want the guy on the outside either.But there's nonetheless something that bugs me about how antiseptic this whole thing reads. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Hall
And I do believe we should spend a lot more time thinking about how we treat people who are disadvantaged and disfavored in evaluating our progress, our decency, our character, because, ultimately, that’s how we’re going to be judged. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Joseph FishkinMost writers and scholars (perhaps most people in general?) [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 pm
And when, as here, you're already in due to a couple of strikes, guess how much time that punch gets you? [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
I don't care how a legal theory might be articulated in a good test case. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:04 pm
  How we differentiate those who live from those who die seems to me a continuing problem.) [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
At which point you'll easily figure out how this one ends up. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
And even Justice Werdegar, who writes a separate concurrence, seems a tiny bit concerned about how broad the "lying in wait" doctrine has been applied -- though not enough to change the result here.) [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Caring for People Who Stop Eating and Drinking to Hasten the End of Life is a 90-page book from the Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG), Dutch Association of Physician Assistants (NAPA), the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG), the Dutch Internists Association (NIV), the Dutch Society for Clinical Geriatrics (NVKG), the Dutch Society for a Voluntary End of Life (NVVE), the Dutch Nursing Society (V&VN), and the Society of Elderly Care Physicians (Verenso). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
She made this statement initially to her doctors, who had been unsuccessfully trying to figure out how the injury was caused and how to treat her, under circumstances that suggest that she revealed this information purely to help the staff try to diagnose what exactly had happened -- and hence treat her. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:40 pm by David Greene
  How We Got Here The case was originally dismissed in June 2014, when US District Judge Lynn Winmill concluded that he was bound by a 1979 Supreme Court decision that found that people did not have privacy interests in the records they share with their phone company. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
It also discusses how and why the case should be taught in American law schools. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by crush
By Tom Watts This morning, the Supreme Court decided McCutcheon v. [read post]