Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 521 - 540 of 6,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2007, 10:36 am
But as to the second order that denied the husband's motion to limit the wife's life insurance benefits and terminate alimony upon her remarriage, a modification is necessary. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:38 pm by moderator
 "The wife filed a divorce complaint against the husband, and the husband counterclaimed for divorce. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by K.O. Herston
Facts: Husband filed for divorce after 25 years of marriage, and Wife filed a counter-complaint. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:14 pm
  Wife’s contributions to Husband’s separate property did not transmute into marital property, but did support an equalization payment to Wife in proportion to her contribution. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
  While the Wife testified that the Husband could work for his previous employer, the Court cited Burkley v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:52 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
A husband and wife are charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering, six counts of money laundering or aiding and abetting money laundering, and one count of harboring or concealing a fugitive. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
The state's highest court upheld the decision of the lower courts to side with an ex-wife against her former husband's... [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Family Law
Howell, a dispute between a divorced couple over the wifes share of the husbands military retirement pay. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am by Lauren E. Koster
  In the recent published (precedential) Appellate Division decision of Tatham v. [read post]