Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY"
Results 521 - 540
of 964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm
The motion now before the court, also dated 31 October 2008, followed. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
We're giving an opportunity for people to resolve the matter and recoup some loss to the creative, for a relatively small amount of money. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
See In Re High Tech Emp. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
Chicago, the court set in motion a major Second Amendment lawmaking project. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
The value of the property was either $245,000.00 (per Mr. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:12 am
The motion to dismiss remains pending before Southern District of New York Judge Colleen McMahon. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
In Pitcairn Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Penalties: fines, prison time, and property forfeiture. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
Hyde Park Savings Bank (In re Bullard), 494 B.R. 92 (BAP 1st Cir. 2013)(11 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Unless you’re just a huge fan of analogies and like to squint a lot. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:25 am
Communications back and forth because someone returned to their home to remove some of their personal property; random fights over a $100 bill that has to be paid when there are no other real financial issues; silly parenting skirmishes that are much ado about nothing, etc. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:31 pm
At his request the hearing was re-scheduled. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
Ultimately she denies the motion to dismiss the cross claim. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
But then, we’re not Pharrell Williams. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Mizer returns to counsel table. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
John’s, Stockton, and its rector and its vestry members, in San Joaquin County Superior Court (2010); (plaintiffs are the remnant diocese of San Joaquin and its bishop; suits seek an order turning over control of all parish property to the bishop of the remnant diocese; Superior Court of Fresno County denied a motion to consolidate all nine cases with the one alrerady pending there [No. 11 above]; cases are in various stages of discovery)21-29. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
The investments realized returns when the real estate had appreciated in value and was either sold or re-financed. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
The current issue before the court is the petitioner’s motion for alternate date of valuation filed with regard to my territory as a yearbook representative. [read post]
