Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The parents have abandoned the child b. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:15 am
§ 10401(c); otherwise, applicant should clarify her status going forward as in propria persona . [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Pohl v Midtal, 2017 ABQB 711 [1] When a parent gives an adult child a joint interest in real property during his or her lifetime, can that gift include an irrevocable right of survivorship that has the effect of preventing the parent from later severing the joint tenancy? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
I have no reason to doubt that they are typical examples of the type of cases referred to the Interested Party in respected of specified offences at the less serious end of the spectrum. [read post]
17 May 2015, 5:54 pm
(c) The testator's son was a beneficiary, as well as a trustee, under a trust created by the will of his father. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
My legal services include family law, divorce, child support, litigation, arbitration, mediation, child custody and visitation, alimony, equitable distribution, separation agreements, palimony, PSA, property settlement agreement, premarital and prenuptial agreements, midmarriage and marital agreements. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:26 pm
Additionally, she argued that C & B, P.C. had an incurable conflict relating to the simultaneous representation of all three plaintiffs in the suit against the landlord. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
"(c) Contempt hearing procedures. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
Under subsection (2), in addition, if the protected person is a child, the authority may make a DVO if satisfied there are reasonable grounds to fear the child will be exposed to domestic violence committed by or against a person with whom the child is in a domestic relationship. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:56 am
Failure to comply with filing a parenting plan may result in the judge adopting the plan of the opposing party if the judge finds such plan to be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:38 pm
From what I've seen to date of the government's plan, I seriously doubt (a), am concerned about (b), and don't really know about (c).Read more here. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:10 pm
Like the mortgage interest deduction. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
Following a permanency hearing, Family Court granted petitioner’s request, finding that “[a] permanency plan of placement for adoption” was in the child’s best interests. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
Section 37(2.1) of the province’s Family Law Act states, (2.1) In the case of an order for support of a child, if the court is satisfied that there has been a change in circumstances within the meaning of the child support guidelines or that evidence not available on the previous hearing has become available, the court may,(a) discharge, vary or suspend a term of the order, prospectively or retroactively;(b) relieve the respondent from the payment of part or… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
Section 37(2.1) of the province’s Family Law Act states, (2.1) In the case of an order for support of a child, if the court is satisfied that there has been a change in circumstances within the meaning of the child support guidelines or that evidence not available on the previous hearing has become available, the court may,(a) discharge, vary or suspend a term of the order, prospectively or retroactively;(b) relieve the respondent from the payment of part or… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:56 pm
C.2.) [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Florida Statutes § 542.335(1)(b)(1) (legitimate business includes “trade secrets”). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:16 am
b. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 8 December 2015 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of In the matter of B (A child) regarding the appellant’s application for their daughter, B, to be made a warden of the court because the respondent had taken her to Pakistan. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, came into force on March 18, 2013, and replaced the province’s 32-year-old Family Relations Act. [read post]
