Search for: "INFORRM" Results 521 - 540 of 882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  We also had an Inforrm case comment on the decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Brian Cathcart summarised Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 of the hearing for Inforrm. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
In what seems to be the first case to consider the this section in an application for an interlocutory injunction, charity boss Michael Meegan failed in his attempt to restrain publication by the Irish Mail on Sunday of allegations that he had made inappropriate sexual advances to males in Kenya: Kearns P held that the newspaper had shown a reasonable defence to any libel action, and that there was no suggestion the defendant was not a “mark” for damages should any libel action succeed… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  There was a comment on these changes from Iain Wilson on Inforrm and a piece in the Sunday Times. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
discussion on the history and future of privacy law from Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm published a list of anonymised privacy injunctions from January to March 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:49 am by INFORRM
It was covered an  Inforrm post by Steven Heffer and reported in the Guardian the New York Times. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:01 am by Adam Wagner
Inforrm’s Blog: The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm by INFORRM
From the Blogs The excellent Cearta.ie blog has listed Inforrm as one of its “Top 10 Online Free Speech Resources”. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:40 am by Adam Wagner
The Inforrm Blog hopes that “a proper, balanced, review can now be conducted (in the spirit of the new, balanced, Government)“, particularly in light of the fact that the commitment is less robust than that in the Conservative Manifesto. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 11:55 am by Charon QC
And John Bolch – provider of a very comprehensive review of analysis and comment on his Family Lore blog – has also created Edgar Venal, a man who lives up to his name and who is the senior partner of Venal & Grabbit, Solicitors Inforrm’s blog:  Can you help the Campaign for Freedom of Information? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has approached leading American journalists for their views on the British Press and the differences in between journalism in the United States and journalism in the UK . [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am by INFORRM
Events On 15 July 2010 there will be an Inforrm/MBL Seminar on Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill (see our post here) Next Week in the Courts On 12 July 2010 Mr Justice Stadlen continues the hearing of the application to strike out in the case of Kaschke v Gray, which is discussed above. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Events We draw attention once again to the Inforrm, Media Standards Trust, Gray’s Inn event on 11 January 2011: “Libel Reform: in the Public’s Interest? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Catherine Arnold, INFORRM’S Blog: Case Law, Strasbourg: Zemmour v France, Journalist’s conviction for inciting discrimination did not breach Article 10. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Facebook Ireland Limited and Another [2013] NIQB 14, (see the Inforrm post here) and of course the potential for a service provider like Google to be liable for defamation after receipt of a complaint: Tamiz  v  Google. [read post]