Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 521 - 540
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
https://t.co/ee8KV9VJMS -> Proprietary Algorithms for Public Purposes – Slaw https://t.co/AsEDSWu2uN -> Google Fights Against Canada https://t.co/fEgthMn2nf -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-07-25 https://t.co/SlVnCAmPqO -> News Alert – Tribunal determination PPCA v Foxtel: https://t.co/SFSBtxZl2a -> Google seeks to use U.S. law to battle Supreme Court of Canada's order to change global search results https://t.co/YRBZjIbugK -> 'Kodi Box'… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:12 pm
As Professor Matthew Ricketson, a journalist and academic who assisted Judge Finkelstein, noted on Inforrm, the report was systematically misrepresented and distorted by the Australian media. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:45 am
For those who are coming to the issue for the first time, or need a little revision, there is no better starting point than the International Forum for Responsible Media (INFORRM) Blog, which has been covering the scandal in meticulous detail since its launch around 18 months ago. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:04 am
However, as Brian Cathcart pointed out in a post on Inforrm, this did not impact on the way that the same newspaper reported the story: “Like almost all of the national Sunday papers, with the exception of the Independent on Sunday, the Sunday Times chose to report and comment upon the Harry affair without giving any editorial space to anyone who expressed the opinion which, its own poll showed, 61 per cent of the country holds. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 11:58 pm
If he lived in the UK to begin with and decided to burn Korans, that would be a different position altogether, although in fact our freedom of expression protections are less robust than those in the US, and he may well have been caught under incitement of racism laws (see this post on Inforrm’s blog for more). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:34 am
As always, Inforrm’s blog have provided excellent analysis of the case here and here. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
They raised the question of whether a right to reputation could be protected by Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, as previously discussed on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
The top 5 posts on Inforrm this week were Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley Law and Media Round Up – 4 August 2014 Case Law: PNM v Times Newspapers, Open justice and reporting information about a suspect – Hugh Tomlinson QC The Sun just keeps getting it wrong on human rights – Adam Wagner Case Law: R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
This remains a matter of doubt, given the apparent paucity of data in the last published figures and a question mark over their completeness, as noted by the Inforrm blog here and here. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Inforrm has a summary here. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On Inforrm, Professor Brian Cathcart argued that the press are “lashing out like cornered animals“. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
We had an Inforrm case comment on the decision. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Marcus Carter and Ben Egliston consider whether this is a genuine bid to set the company on course for the future of computing, or merely a PR exercise, for Inforrm this week. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:01 am
(Hat-tip to INFORRM and Ashley Hurst, who have documented both phases of the consultation.) [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
Background Much of the background to the case can be found in this Inforrm news story from November 2011. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The Inforrm Blog posted analysis of the difficulties of proving libel. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
In what seems to be the first case to consider the this section in an application for an interlocutory injunction, charity boss Michael Meegan failed in his attempt to restrain publication by the Irish Mail on Sunday of allegations that he had made inappropriate sexual advances to males in Kenya: Kearns P held that the newspaper had shown a reasonable defence to any libel action, and that there was no suggestion the defendant was not a “mark” for damages should any libel action succeed… [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
There was also an Inforrm news item and one on the 5RB website. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
