Search for: "Imperial v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000, on insolvency proceedings (Regulation), deals with proceedings being conducted in one EU Member State, while an insolvency proceedings involving one of the parties to the arbitration agreement was opened in another Member State. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
I've tried, something like twelve times tonight, to load up and watch the oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
It was clear, after the oral argument, that Imperial County had been all but eliminated as a candidate. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
It is in fact a mantra of EU law that one of the duties of the Community legislature itself is to ensure “a high level of health protection”; see the ruling by the ECJ and the Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed in case C-491/01 R v Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453 at paragraphs 119-121 and 229-230. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
United Galvanizing, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Court opined, in Brookfield Homes v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
The ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project filed a friend-of-the-court brief (PDF) in the case, Martinez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:25 pm
The case is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm
Martin v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm
Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:55 am
State of Bihar be shapeless, formless like Agni or Vayu , or even a simple piece of wood. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
There is no case of Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Avrutin, Jews and the Imperial State: Identification Politics in Tsarist Russia,(Cornell Univ. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
The Framers also created a limited executive, but today we have an imperial executive, who gets the country into wars (whereas the Constitution says Congress is the branch that should declare wars). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
The Prop 8 backers’ appeal is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:40 am
In 1984, the California Supreme Court ruled unequivocally in Hartzell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 3:12 am
In Catlin Syndicate Limited v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Counties are considered subdivisions of the State when they are applying State laws or policies, and Judge Walker went out of his way to demonstrate that the application of Proposition 8 was a matter of statewide, and not local, policy (which is the rationale he gave for denying the application to intervene filed by Imperial County -- see pp. 9-17 of his unpublished decision). [read post]
