Search for: "In Re: Little v."
Results 521 - 540
of 10,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
So given the contours of the existing law, it makes little sense to say that it's okay to drive with weed in a closed container (paragraph (c)) if you've got a scrip from a doctor, but not okay to do so if you don't have a scrip (paragraph (b)). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:37 pm
(citing In re Bullion Reserve of N. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
And this little stand was mighty successful. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:18 pm
“A little fact is worth a whole limbo of dreams. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
Those laws were enacted by several states with a lot of fanfare, but they have seen little, if any, activity. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Under Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed the parameters of this right in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
See Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
Click to enlarge.PFC = prima facie caseLNR = legitimate, non-discriminatory reasonPrice-Waterhouse = Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm
The occasion was a hearing on a motion to dismiss in Cockrum v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
We could fill this blog post with not-so-subtle references to Goofy, Mickey Mouse, or, for you old-timers, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, but frankly, we’re still a little alarmed at what the Southern District of Florida did the other day in Nelson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
The new bill contains few surprises, adding little to its “private predecessor” and removing two controversial clauses, relating to ISPs and corporations. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am
It’s poorly & confusingly drafted, and as a result, lawmakers—even if they’re not sympathetic to sex workers—have little to show for their work. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
We must have been a little asleep at the switch, because, several weeks ago, now, the Solicitor General, on behalf of the FDA, filed the government's merits amicus brief in the Riegel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Under such a view, the alleged bribery might be seen as an expedient, perhaps regrettable, perhaps not, to support and re-inforce the natural order, a kind of historical determinism in which the little things like alleged bribes are all subsumed in inevitability. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:25 pm
Not too long ago, in Kimble v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:03 am
" Multiply those numbers together and you get $297 million -- a little less than half as much as $644 million.And here's the thing: a source with knowledge of the real numbers tells us we're so low in our estimate of the Times's printing costs that we're not even in the ballpark.Are we trying to say the the New York Times should force all its print subscribers onto the Kindle or else? [read post]
