Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases"
Results 521 - 540
of 551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Urciuoli, No. 07-1297 "Convictions and sentences for mail fraud and conspiracy as part of a scheme to bribe a state legislator are vacated and remanded where jury instructions were over-broad insofar as they allowed the jury to consider certain behavior of the legislator as a deprivation of honest services. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 408(a)(8) The judgment of the District Court sentencing the defendant to 57 months is reversed, and the case is remanded for re-sentencing. 08a0025p.06 American Zurich v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Upton, No. 07-1456 Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's challenges to: 1) the voluntariness of his Miranda waiver; 2) the admission of a police officer's expert and lay testimony; 3) the district court's denial of certain jury instructions; and 4) his status as an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:49 pm
A Benton County jury acquitted White of related charges in November 2001. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
" (In re Marriage of Fink (1979) 25 Cal.3d 877, 887.) [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
THE INCOMPETENT ADMINISTRATION OFLETHAL INJECTION PROCEDURES HASRESULTED IN FORESEEABLE ANDPREVENTABLE PROBLEMS IN NUMEROUSEXECUTIONS.......................................................29CONCLUSION..........................................................36TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
This case presents a single issue on appeal: whether a bankruptcy court may retain a case filed in an improper venue under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 1:35 am
The snitches, Johnson contended, should be held to the same standard. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
However, the case is remanded for resentencing. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
"We don't have enough data, which in itself is a problem," she said.The team recommended a ban on executing offenders with severe mental illness, better jury instructions, tougher attorney qualifications and improved monitoring of capital case procedures. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
In re Morgan, No. 07-70201 (10-9-07). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
This is a very low standard, compared to criminal law. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
"To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:23 am
It's worthy of review for anyone facing an issue re: limitiation on cross-examination. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Alaska, and this error was notharmless under the Brecht standard. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
SOURCE: Lawsuits.comA.A.R.P.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:49 pm
Oh, we're rolling? [read post]
