Search for: "In Re General American Communications Corp." Results 521 - 540 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  The claim pleaded that the text message was sent for the purpose of diminishing the appellant in the eyes of his wife and his church community in general. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
We’re releasing these as we get ready to submit a big filing in the FCC’s “Future of Media” proceeding (deadline is May 7th). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The community advisory group also will act as a communication conduit and forum for stakeholders within the community surrounding the Bannister Federal Complex. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
: (creativecommons.org), Neil Netanel’s copyright paradox: (Patry Copyright Blog), Isn’t it ironic: TechCrunch blames the music industry for the dangerous ideas of Lessig and the free culture movement: (IPcentral.com) CFP: First interdisciplinary research workshop on free culture: (creativecommons.org), Of limitations, exceptions and verse (WIPO copyright committee): (KEI) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General … [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm by Eric
We already have problems with USTRs being IP maximalists, but this section would dramatically expand the number of IP maximalists in the US diplomatic corps. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "The Human Rights Obligations of Stet-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structure and Principles in National and International Law and Policy," which appears in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational law 50(4):827-888 (2017). [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
However, the Plaintiff maintains that the duty that should be imposed is consistent with the public policy of the State of New York, which has established similar duties to third parties in other cases.If Plaintiff's argument is entertained, the Court would be forced to engage in a profound re-examination of negligence law that was addressed in Palsgraf v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK Writing for the Brookings Institution’s Tech Tank blog, Mohit Kaushal and Margaret Darling argued for turning healthcare data into a public utility. [read post]