Search for: "In Re Holmes" Results 521 - 540 of 1,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 6:59 am by Dave Wieneke
You’re invited to a free briefing by members of the ISITE Design team who are helping clients create more effective personalized clients across digital channels. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
Judge Crabb cited Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes when she wrote, “[I]f blind adherence to the past is the only justification for the law, it must fail. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 6:59 am by Dave Wieneke
You’re invited to a free briefing by members of the ISITE Design team who are helping clients create more effective personalized clients across digital channels. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
 This fixation on the Warren and Burger Courts is a symptom of a larger dis-ease: Whether you are a judge or an advocate, a bureaucrat or a legislative counsel, the place to begin your study of the modern Constitution is with the great decisions of a long line of Justices from Holmes to Scalia. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Covert, and of course Justice Holmes wrote the seminal treaty power and federalism opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:53 am
Contents include:The Global ForumManuel Fröhlich, The John Holmes Memorial Lecture: Representing the United Nations: Individual Actors, International Agency, and LeadershipLouise Arbour, The Relationship Between the ICC and the UN Security CouncilPaul Meyer, A Banner Year for Conventional Arms Control? [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
”  Holmes famously complained (in another context) that it is “revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
Superior Ct. 1994), In re Conservatorship of Angela D. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Consider this classic example of a patent law conundrum, drawn from the ever-fascinating (and factually gnarly)8 case of In re Bass:9The policy aspects of the Bass holding are also of interest. . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Courts sometimes have stepped in first in looking at new tech, and Congress followed: Justice Holmes, 1911, Court extended copyright to motion pictures. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Remedies and EnforcementModerator: Mitchell Zimmerman, Fenwick & West LLPTo copyright maximalists, the entire population of the world seems to be Holmes’ bad man.Corynne McSherry, Electronic Frontier FoundationBroad agreement on need to fix, even if we don’t agree how. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm by admin
Pfizer sought to reverse the First Circuit’s decision by arguing that the decision ran afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision Holmes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
[and on and on and on, such that this part of the syllabus explaining who agrees with what jot and tittle is longer than the average Oliver Wendell Holmes opinion]. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:11 am by Staci Zaretsky
Tulsa will toss you cash if you’re from the sticks, and TJSL will guarantee you money if you’re smart. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm by Kim Krawiec
Perez’s experience is far more typical, as evidenced in this exchange at trial between Judge Holmes and the clinic COO:  THE COURT: Hmm. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
  Specifically, the jury found that plaintiff Rhonda Holmes, a lawyer who briefly represented Love in disputes stemming from the estate of Love's husband Kurt Cobain, had not proved the degree of fault on Love's part necessary for Holmes to win the case. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
  Specifically, the jury found that plaintiff Rhonda Holmes, a lawyer who briefly represented Love in disputes stemming from the estate of Love's husband Kurt Cobain, had not proved the degree of fault on Love's part necessary for Holmes to win the case. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
  Specifically, the jury found that plaintiff Rhonda Holmes, a lawyer who briefly represented Love in disputes stemming from the estate of Love's husband Kurt Cobain, had not proved the degree of fault on Love's part necessary for Holmes to win the case. [read post]