Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 521 - 540 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
  Prescribing physicians and the medical community as a whole were also noted as interested parties in the litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
  Prescribing physicians and the medical community as a whole were also noted as interested parties in the litigation. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
But on appeal, a divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit granted relief. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
The plaintiffs argued that the company "must have known about the additional $9.7 million in medical costs in April and June of 2006, when the allegedly false statements were made, because Centene touts its ability to predict medical costs. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:49 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
“This clearly indicates that the campaigns and strategies, and the way those campaigns and strategies have been provided, is in need of urgent review and re-direction,” he said. [read post]
24 May 2020, 12:36 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
They're the ones responsible for that training, the rookie cop did what he'd been taught to do.Incidentally, as part of the City Council's demand for an audit of Austin PD training practices, a panel has been appointed to review all the videos used by the department. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:41 am
You may also follow the TTABlog on Twitter: @TTABlog.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:TTAB Affirms 2(a) Deceptiveness Refusal of SIKSILK for ClothingSection 2(a) - False Connection:TTAB Reverses Section 2(a) False Connection Refusal of GIPA for Intellectual Property ServicesSection 2(c) Consent to Register:Rejecting First Amendment Claim, TTAB Affirms Section 2(c) Refusal of TRUMP TOO SMALL for ShirtsSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: FOUNDATIONAL MEDICINE REVIEW Confusable With FOUNDATION… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
In re Adoption of the Unborn Child of B.W., 889 N.E.2d 1236 (Ind. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Pollard on Inmate Litigants, a recent paper of mine that appeared in the Akron Law Review. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Not long ago, a colleague told me about going to a conference that included a panel on teaching international and comparative law. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
Whether it’s medical devices or car navigation, better security makes us safer. [read post]