Search for: "In Re Robert Adams" Results 521 - 540 of 949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/MoacPj (Michael Arkfeld, Stephanie Loquvam) Be Considerate When You Share Data -  http://bit.ly/QzeYZ7 (Amy Bowser-Rollins) Challenges of Conducting eDiscovery on Ephemeral Data - http://bit.ly/OCkHL1 (Brian Esser, Judy Selby) Concept over Keywords – Why Search Still Matters for Law Firms - http://bit.ly/Mh4Hkm (Simon Price) CVEDR Take II – Monkeys and Magistrates in Monterey - http://bit.ly/M3NM4u (Greg Buckles)… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
On July 18, I noted that Chief Justice Roberts had issued a stay in Maryland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:52 am by Rob Robinson
Joins Other States in Ruling that Cloud Computing is Ethical for Lawyers – http://bit.ly/M1U5qa (Bob Ambrogi) Nevada PI Plaintiff Claiming $61 Million in Damages Forced to Turn Over Social Media Postings – http://bit.ly/NggPRk (Adam Losey) New Ethical Rules Affecting eDiscovery in the Works - http://bit.ly/PGxu48 (Al McNee) New Jersey District Judge Upholds Sanctions for Camden County’s Grossly Negligent Litigation Hold Procedures… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm by Orin Kerr
Crawrford’s sources are adamant that it was truly a joint effort of the dissenters. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Nina Totenberg of NPR and Adam Liptak of The New York Times are there. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
(Attachments: # 1 Declaration of William Adams, # 2 Proposed Order)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 7/5/2012) (Entered: 07/05/2012) 07/05/2012 - 1216 - BILL OF COSTS by Google Inc.. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by SHG
We have some inkling what John Roberts thinks of the matter. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
We're not going to wade very far into the debate over the SCOTUS decision that mostly upheld the Affordable Healthcare Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:48 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion provides some language suggesting the high court was not radically re-reading precedent on the commerce clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
Raich, the Court held that the Feds could criminalize the production and use of home-grown marijuana, because of the possibleeffecton interstate commerce:  if you’re growing your own weed, that means you’re not buying it from someplace else, which might be out of state, so your choice affects the price that is charged for the drug on a national level. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm by Dan Filler
 They're in no particular order and readers are encouraged to add additional links within the comments. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm by The Charge
This watershed ruling required re-examination of many evidentiary standards and has prompted significant litigation. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
I don’t think there’s anything particularly odd about that when you’re facing such an issue. [read post]