Search for: "In re: PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CONDUCT OF COUNSEL"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
In re: Digitek Products Liability Litigation, MDL-1968 (S.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Fine, 867 P.2d 610, 618 (Wash. 1994) (once suit is filed "a patient . . . cannot insist on continued confidentiality from her physicians regarding the condition at issue based on the fiduciary nature of their relationship"); Vredeveld v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
" Father appealed, and the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court.When there are competing parental claims to custody, the family court must conduct an adversarial proceeding and ultimately make an award that is in "the best interest of the child. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
And that Justice Hart said (¶82): I would strongly suggest you do not do anything because you’re in more trouble than you think. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm
He placed reliance upon the case of the In Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 which was a Presidential Reference regarding the allocation of natural resources in the context of cellular licenses. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
Many thanks to our excellent pro bono counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
If a judge has previously approved every transaction you’re currently being sued over, surely a jury of your peers isn’t going to slam you for that same conduct, right? [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 3:05 am
She specialised in public law care proceedings. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
Have a Plan to Keep Your Family Safe Of course, parental emotions often run high regarding custody of the children. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 pm
Counsel for the agency, counsel for the mother and the law guardian presented summations to the Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
In New York, an adopted person cannot access his or her original birth certificate unless the adopted person goes through a judicial proceeding and, even then, the outcome does not guarantee that access will be granted. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm
In paternity proceedings in which genetic marker or DNA testing is conducted pursuant to a court order, the process of admissibility presumes compliance with the numerous requirements and standards set forth in Public Health Law and the regulations enacted thereupon. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:20 pm
In paternity proceedings in which genetic marker or DNA testing is conducted pursuant to a court order, the process of admissibility presumes compliance with the numerous requirements and standards set forth in Public Health Law and the regulations enacted thereupon. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
” On June 25, Adams's counsel requested and participated in a telephone conference with the trial court and plaintiffs' counsel. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
Creditors' rights -- Execution of consent judgment -- Motion to stay writ of execution and vacate levy on debtors' personal residence on ground that residence was debtors' homestead -- Trial court denied debtors due process when it refused to hear debtors' homestead exemption objection -- Objection was raised in emergency motion to stay and was therefore before the trial court at the time of hearing; counsel for debtors told court that he had argument pertaining to… [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am
Res. 59), featuring testimony by former State Department Legal Adviser John B. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
Northwest Justice Project Staff Attorney – Native American Unit – Re-Entry Services. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Upon joint motions regarding Defendant’s competency from Defendant’s counsel and the State, the trial court issued an order finding Defendant competent to stand trial on 23 October 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
But the solicitor-client relationship provides: (1) the fiduciary duty devoted to the client; (2) law society financial oversight and professional conduct discipline; (3) professional insurance; and, (4) CPD/CLE obligations to maintain competence. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
