Search for: "In re: Power Integrations, Inc."
Results 521 - 540
of 597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 10:44 am
Mike Lee (R-UT) on the Division of Congressional and Executive Powers. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Safeguards under the Investigatory Powers Act for journalistic material gathered in bulk by UK intelligence agencies will be re-examined in the High Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Res. 658, Passed July 14, 1977). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Supreme Court Justice Ramos in reaching this same conclusion stated: The integrity of the market mattered before the action was initiated and it matters now. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Given the power of incontestability, one might think it would be carefully granted. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
We’re victims, too! [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am
They used their power we entrusted them with to exercise violence against us if we don’t give up our rights and Liberty. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm
I give her a big fat F for changing the group power point at eleven last night and resubmitting. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
Furthermore, the Commission has also held that even repeated and deliberate use of numerous expletives is not indecent or profane under the FCC’s policy if the expletives are "integral" to the work. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Civil and criminal libel cases "are subject to the same constitutional limitations," even when the speech is on a matter of public concern and is about a public figure or official.[2] All the other First Amendment exceptions that the Court has explicitly recognized authorize criminal liability for speech, since such criminal liability is often the only viable way to punish and deter the unprotected speech: incitement, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, fraud, threats, or speech… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Cardozo Introduction Professor of Jurisprudence, Brian Leiter,[1] argues that even though economics, psychology, and history play a large role in the study of law today, philosophy has been an integral part of the academic discipline for a much longer time. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Congress passed laws to ban what they saw as threats to the integrity of elections, foreign policy, and national security. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
That puts Biden at odds with powerful elements of his party’s liberal base. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Harper itself adopts the approach the SCC took in Reference re Prov. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
