Search for: "In re: Snowden"
Results 521 - 540
of 678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Después, haznos saber tu plan para vincularlo y re-transmitir tu esfuerzo. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:58 pm
Then, let us know what your plan is, so we can link and re-broadcast your efforts. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
” And Paul linked to an article by David Gioe analyzing the deterrent effect of Snowden’s leaks on future intelligence activities. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:40 am
FB provides “tools” to control privacy, but they’re too hard to use. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:02 am
We’re targeted even by some of the nations that “feigned surprise” and international critics also recognize our special responsibilities. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:38 pm
We’re also not going to see a man-the-barricades, defend-everything speech. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:44 am
You’re online, ensconced in a muscled avatar, hacking your way through a World of Warcraft quest. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am
Paul linked to a useful National Review summary of Snowden leaks relating to US surveillance abroad. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:47 pm
* The Guardian: the Snowden incident portends the death of the Internet. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:11 am
Looking for hard data on the impact of the Snowden leaks on U.S. industry? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:05 pm
Europe's much-ballyhooed, and much-flawed, proposal to re-write its privacy laws for the next twenty years collapsed. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 3:19 pm
If you’re an academic, you might want to consider co-signing one initiative launched today. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:13 am
If you’re at all confused as to what’s going on in South Sudan, here’s a great breakdown of the crisis. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 7:50 am
While I have been no fan of Edward Snowden, I have also become no fan of the NSA. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
istorjia While we’re all wiping the champagne-induced sleep from our eyes, inevitably we have to sober up for 2014. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:10 pm
” Schneier is correct—as long as we’re talking about a private ordering regime. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
Now that federal judges have applied Smith differently in the NSA surveillance cases, the Supreme Court will have to re-examine Smith and decide again what the Fourth Amendment means in this context. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 11:40 am
Snowden, customers who use telephones throughout the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
(We’re lookin’ at you, U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
We’re back! [read post]
