Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 521 - 540
of 807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
[Stanford Social Innovation Review] Dakota Access Pipeline Dakota Pipeline Update: When Resistance Is a Matter of Protection [Nonprofit Quarterly] American Indians Shouldn’t Get Shortchanged by Philanthropy [Chronicle of Philanthropy] Merrick Garland’s Nomination and the Empty Supreme Court Seat Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court [CNN] The Supreme Court Needs a Ninth Justice Immediately [The Washington Post] Zika Epidemic Zika Spread Prompts… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:24 am
Even the one death I was glad of was spoiled when the Senate declined to take up Merrick Garland's appointment. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 10:41 am
Obama would re-nominate Garland to the Supreme Court, the Senate would immediately take up Durbin’s motion to confirm Garland, and then Democrats would use the nuclear option to ram through Garland’s confirmation with only 34 of 100 duly elected senators voting in the affirmative. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
More.ICYMI: The University of Chicago's Geoffrey Stone likens the Republican Senators' refusal to give Judge Merrick Garland a hearing to FDR's Court-Packing Plan. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
That said, I think Judge Garland’s record on the D.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:33 am
Garland who was appointed to the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
When Republicans start to say that they do not share that sense, and they realize that all they need to do is to refuse to accept old norms, then all bets are off.A (Possibly) Extreme Example of Trump/Republican HardballAgain, the Garland example of constitutional hardball is by now old news, and it was not Donald Trump’s doing. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:29 am
Lawprof Stephen Clark has gone full Timothy Leary down the Garland rabbit hole. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:32 am
(And, just for the record, let me reiterate that President Obama lacks the power to bypass the Senate on the Garland nomination.) [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:28 am
” Having recognized that his own nominations can be torpedoed (as well as anything else he proposes), acting presidential entails telling Republican senators that held up Garland that Americans are sick and tired of stupid political games, that he has come to Washington to actually get stuff done, and therefore re-nominates him. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 10:32 am
You may recall that President Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the Chief Judge of the D.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 10:32 am
You may recall that President Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the Chief Judge of the D.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:16 am
You’re still dead. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” At The Hill, Alexander Bolton reports that “Hillary Clinton will face a tough decision on the Supreme Court if she wins the presidency on Tuesday,” because she will have to choose between re-nominating Chief Judge Merrick Garland or succumbing to pressure from the left “to jettison Obama’s centrist nominee and pick a younger and more liberal judge. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
” And at NPR, Wade Goodwyn and Nina Totenberg assess the political landscape and question whether “this continued refusal to act on the Garland nomination” is “a smart move for conservatives. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:34 am
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that “It’s much more difficult for us to do our job if we are not what we’re intended to be ― a court of nine. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
“Our country is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation of power first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
The GOP Senators have held off, in the hope that the GOP candidate might win and get to make the appointment, but if they think Trump is going to lose, their best option might be to move on Garland while they still have a shred of a chance to act as though they're just doing the normal thing of confirming the President's nominee.Should the GOP Senate move now to confirm Garland? [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Both Chief Judge Garland and Judge Srinivasan recused themselves. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:02 am
” Clinton did not say, and Wallace did not ask, whether she would re-nominate Garland if she were elected and the Senate had not acted on his nomination by the time she took office. [read post]
