Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 521 - 540
of 33,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 11:18 am
The lead case, In re Alphabet Inc. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:34 pm
In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 09-MD-2118-SLR (D. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:35 pm
The Foundation was set up to provide scholarships and bursaries as well as operating grants for the MulgaveSchool.In 2011, after the gifts were made, the MulgaveSchool, the MulgaveSchoolbegan a fundraising campaign to buy land and build a SeniorsSchool. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
News of the amendment of Amazon's recent re-examined one-click patent seemed to surprise some commentators.This is pretty standard, really. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:19 pm
In an item carried Dec. 13 called “Eleven Top Stem Cell Researchers Back Klein for Re-Election,” we wrote, “All but one of them have tens of millions of dollars at stake in grants from the stem cell agency and are heavily invested in basic research, as opposed to translational efforts to push research into the clinic. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:44 am
If you're going to do crap work in approving patents, then at least allow for a reasonable review system in situations when they're challenged.IPBiz notes that the review mechanism is the same for the first and second window of post-grant review, so the only issue is "when" the review may occur. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:57 am
Better late than never didn't work for this Opposer, when the Board granted Applicant's motion to quash and to exclude the testimony of 26 [count 'em, 26!] [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
Here's the court of appeals case info if you're interested. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:52 am
OK, now we're getting somewhere...click on the title to go to the press release from DHS. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
If the initiation of re-exams is largely a function of litigation, there is a soft cap on the number of potential reexams that will be initiated. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:14 pm
"[A]re the Alabama sturgeon and the shovelnose sturgeon separate species? [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:31 pm
By contrast, Patent Docs, pushing their particular subjective and outdated view of biotechnology patents, still doesn't get it, assigning multiple errors to the Federal Circuit court rather than trying to formulate a workable understanding of the rule now applied in In re Kubin and applicable to the grant or denial of all biotechnology patents in the future. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:52 am
See In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 7 and 8 v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:13 am
Citizens or nationals of Haiti under a grant of Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, are required to re-register during the applicable re-registration period in order to maintain their protected status. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 5:51 am
""Denton County developed a new program called the TARMAC Program (Take Action, Re-Integrate, Make A Change). [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:01 am
The case, In re Hamilton, considered a trial court’s refusal to grant a petition because granting it would not comply with the federal Jacob Wetterling Act, as amended, and other [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:52 am
Ingrid Eagly blogged about the case when the Court granted certiorari, In her preview of the case for SCOTUSBlog, Jennifer Koh... [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am
They entered an agreed parenting plan designating Mother as the primary residential parent and granting Father 74 days of parenting time. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:45 am
This is an appeal against a refusal by the Northern Ireland High Court and Court of Appeal ([2010] NICA 13) to grant a declaration that inquests into the killings of the Appellants’ next of kin by British security forces were required to comply with the requirements of Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:54 am
Watson’s intent to re-file a PMWA claim in state court is not plain prejudice. [read post]
