Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
On December 2, 2020, the district court held an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the petition and heard testimony from X.; one of X. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” 735 ILCS 5/2-619(a)(3) (I believe that both petitions for order of protection should be heard and the subsequent petition for order of protection should be treated as a counter-petition but I would be remiss if I did not suggest a motion to dismiss) If you already have an order of protection and the opposing side files a petition for an order of protection, file a motion to dismiss based on the fact that this issue has already been heard and… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:52 pm
” [via FindLaw] In re William Josef Berkley, 2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
C-1-CV-16-011009 in Travis County Court at law No. 2. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:39 am
These are seizures that involve altered awareness or responsiveness (such as what is also called a petit mal seizure). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
Nashiri’s counsel filed another motion soon after in the CMCR to disqualify the military judges on his panel on the grounds that their appointment violated 10 U.S.C. 973(b)(2)–the statute referenced above and at issue in the three granted petitions. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Initial attempts to settle the matter were unsuccessful, and this litigation followed. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeals then begins its analysis of the parties’ respective arguments, noting, initially, that [Patrick F.] [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
I would wait 6 months before initiating a Service Request with the USCIS. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
Latham filed a petition for re-hearing, which was denied on September 19, 2014, and then, on the court’s own motion, was granted on September 25, 2014. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
Latham filed a petition for re-hearing, which was denied on September 19, 2014, and then, on the court’s own motion, was granted on September 25, 2014. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 11:01 am
A statement of the opponent made the Board consider whether novelty was still an issue:[2] The question of lack of novelty, initially raised by the opponent and already decided in case T 785/05 was indirectly addressed again by reference to another case in the Opponent’s letter of 29 September 2008 […]. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
The distinction between a "case" and a "petition" will be discussed more below too.A similar result was reached in the case of In re Calderon, 2006 WL 871477 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
The distinction between a "case" and a "petition" will be discussed more below too.A similar result was reached in the case of In re Calderon, 2006 WL 871477 (Bankr. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Moreover, this filing date would extend back to any foreign priority date, effectively overruling In re Hilmer.[5] As in current practice under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
’At the close of the evidence, the juvenile court. . . . sustained the petition beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
You will be able to get all your paperwork turned in to the court and your divorce judgment approved, but the divorce itself will not be final until at least 6 months after the initial petition. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 4:15 pm
But they’ve now become so big that artists need NotJustOk to plug them.L: So when artists do that, when they’re getting paid by the pirate, selling the initial copy to the pirate to then produce and give out, or they’re trying to solicit NotJustOk to play their music, when does it turn from being a pirate infringing thing into part of the industry and part of the business model? [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:11 am
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent op-ed, the Editorial Board of The New York Times criticized a series of moves by the Trump Administration to dissemble climate change initiatives made by the Obama Administration, including President Trump’s speech in Detroit pledging to restore a mid-term review process for fuel efficiency standards, a budget proposal that includes significant cuts to the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent op-ed, the Editorial Board of The New York Times criticized a series of moves by the Trump Administration to dissemble climate change initiatives made by the Obama Administration, including President Trump’s speech in Detroit pledging to restore a mid-term review process for fuel efficiency standards, a budget proposal that includes significant cuts to the U.S. [read post]
