Search for: "In re TM"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
In re McDonald’s Corporation, 199 USPQ 490 (TTAB 1978). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
In a world where we’re departing from that, we should consider congressional purposes. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Nov. 20, 2013) This VARA dispute makes some interesting moves on irreparable harm—it’s hard to see why courts are still stuck in “copyright/TM harm is irreparable” given what they’re doing elsewhere.Plaintiffs sought to prevent the destruction of their graffiti art on the exterior of defendants’ buildings, which are scheduled for demolition. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Republished by Blog Post Promoter"TM" this, "TM" that.... [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Other coverage: defamation via Twitter, TM Infringement via LinkedIN (Rebecca Tushnet) Related posts: Logging Into Someone Else’s Facebook Account and Posting Messages on Their Friends’ Walls Could Be Identity Theft — In re Rolando S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am
If you’re reading this on the Intertubes right now, a state trademark registration isn’t enough for you. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
Slow process of realizing, not in a super activist way, that we can re/create culture. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
With respect to TMs, the Chinese TM examination does not take into account whether someone else owns the TM outside of China, or if it is a famous TM outside of China. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:22 am
and Article 40(5) of the proposed Directive re “Designation and classification of goods and services” reads The use of general terms, including the general indications of the class headings of the Nice Classification, shall be interpreted as including all the goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indication or term. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
Q: conclusions might question the validity of trade dress law, since they’re so inconclusive. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:37 am
Discussant: Graeme Dinwoodie, Oxford University The cases at issue could be framed differently; this helps us assess whether we’re surprised by the results. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:50 am
Q: we’re thinking about classifying Apple etc. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
Also rejected, opposed by TM bar. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 4:44 am
Sept. 3, 2013) I’m blogging this case because it has interesting TM/branding implications. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:35 pm
If it goes to moderation because, for example, you’re new here, the time stamp on your comment is what counts. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
However, a plaintiff seeking to protect trade dress in a product line must articulate the elements comprising the trade dress and make clear how they’re distinctive. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:18 am
Now you’re all caught up! [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:15 am
“TM” this, “TM” that…. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
An “®” indication must appear on all products bearing Princeton’s registered marks and a “TM” on products containing any of Princeton’s marks that are not yet registered. . . . [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:35 pm
Although I haven’t handled Budweiser’s bowtie can yet, I’m thinking it’s probably easier to grip too, but no point going there if you’re Anheuser-Busch, why risk the danger of making grip a selling point, especially if you want to keep your non-traditional trademark options open? [read post]
