Search for: "In the Matter of DR" Results 521 - 540 of 9,800
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 6:11 am by Aparajita Lath
Glenn Cohen, Gideon Schor and Vern Noviel, on behalf of Dr. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am by Leah Litman
On pages 52-53 of the opinion, the district court recites the very serious allegation that the Department of Health and Human Services “suppressed speech on hydroxychloroquine” by having Dr. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am by Leah Litman
On pages 52-53 of the opinion, the district court recites the very serious allegation that the Department of Health and Human Services “suppressed speech on hydroxychloroquine” by having Dr. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
’ In another recent case, Nicklin J (at [23]) interpreted the key point of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Banks, so far as it relates to the serious harm test, to be that the statement is ‘not defamatory unless’ the claimant has proved as a matter of fact that the publication has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to reputation, and that ‘inherent qualities’ alone do not suffice for this (even if the Court only emphasised this in relation to… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by Will Newman
And so I was extremely fortunate that Dr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:02 pm by David Pocklington
Changing the level of fees is therefore a matter of economic justice”. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Fancourt J commented that this pair have recently had “a lot to say about this matter outside of court. [read post]