Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. J. J." Results 521 - 540 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Government consultation on equal civil marriage Obiter J blogs on the government’s consultation on civil marriage, which relates to the right of same-sex couples to have equal access to marriage. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am by Clare Ciborowska
What is required is a detailed analysis of the child’s welfare which will inherently be different in every case. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am by Rosalind English
Comfort may be drawn from Charles Js courageous stand on this point: on any further application, the claimant should not be fobbed off by the argument that only Parliament could bring about the development and change that the claimant seeks here. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
In this regard he noted the “vulnerability” of institutions with responsibility for children, including those involved in sports at a high level, to preserving their own reputations over the interests and welfare of those in their care. [104, 107] These factors were not in issue here but, nevertheless “what is appropriate priority and what is for the welfare of children and young people, is itself a matter fit for public discussion”. [107] Finally… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  Welfare for the rich is apparently fine and dandy under Rick Santorum's version of morality. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
   the effect of the wrong on the plaintiff’s health, welfare, social, business or financial position; 3. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm by Scott C. Idleman
  Their contention, moreover, appears not to be that the Animal Welfare Act as a whole is unconstitutional, but only that its application to their particular conduct exceeds Congress’s interstate commerce power. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Richman, 652 F.3d 360 (3rd Cir. 2011 Hardiman, J.). [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench's relevant observations are set out as under: "........A wise exercise of judicial power inevitably takes care of the evil conseq [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The term refers to the fact of printing free from prior restraint, and not at all to the matter printed, whether good or bad. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm by familoo
The Court’s view is that this is a matter that the Law Commission may want to review, since kidnap offers a sufficiently lengthy maximum sentence (life) but is usually impractical, whilst Child Abduction pursuant to The Act carries a potentially inadequate maximum sentence of 7 years. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:20 am by SHG
It's a matter of allocation of scarce resources. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Nov. 23, 2011 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrence R. [read post]