Search for: "J (I) Wills"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
”12 The Court was also troubled by the argument requiring it to interpret “principles of equity” to refer to “a substantive rule about mens rea from a discrete domain like trademark law,” instead of a “fundamental rule[] that appl[ies] more systematically across claims and practice areas. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
I doubt the Supreme Court will be willing to go there. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:04 pm
I was willing to give Governor's the benefit of the doubt. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
’” Chaplinsky at 135 (Powell, J., concurring) (citation omitted). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:55 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Review of the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:30 am
Beyer’s article Digital Wills: Has the Time Come for Wills to Join the Digital Revolution is cited in the following article: Ronald J. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
On his first evening in office, he froze regulations in the pipeline and reversed President Donald J. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
If someone will give her $1,000, though, she is willing to give it a shot. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
” I confess I simply don’t see this. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
The Senate trial in the second impeachment of Donald J. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 3:08 am
“She is adept at managing risk and always willing to get involved in complex matters. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
On everything else, there is nothing but whataboutism and willful amnesia.If all of that is true—and it is completely true—one might surmise that the Republicans’ continued insistence on repeating baseless arguments is motivated by fear. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
It’s an open question in my mind whether Donald J. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
February 1, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
February 1, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 3:31 pm
I was wrong. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
by Jingru Wang, Wuhan University Institute of International Law Background A blocking statute is adopted by a country to hinder the extraterritorial application of foreign legislation.[1] For example, the EU adopted Council Regulation No 2271/96 (hereinafter “EU Blocking Statute”) in 1996 to protest the US’s extraterritorial sanctions legislation concerning Cuba, Iran and Libya.[2] Since Donald Trump became the US president, the US government officially defined China as its… [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
I commented that people like Wood and Sidney Powell “are probably the Orly Taitzes of the ongoing ‘election challenges,’ but time will tell whether they are willing to fail as often and as publicly as she did. [read post]
