Search for: "JOHN DOES, 1-4; Correctional Officers" Results 521 - 540 of 699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm by Andrew Berger
§602 (a)(1) Trumps the First Sale Doctrine The cloud lingering over the gray market industry since the Supreme Court split 4-4 in Costco just got a lot darker. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
" Bishop Edwards protests, contrary to the allegation in the Missouri lawsuit, that:No such report was sent to the Diocese of Nevada and, to this day, we have no knowledge of its existence other than an assertion by the plaintiff’s personal injury lawyer in a John Doe lawsuit against the monastery. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Moria Miller
What does the University mean to you and why are you so passionate about it? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Novo Nordisk A/SDocket: 10-844Issue(s): Whether the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act applies when (1) there is “an approved method of using the drug” that “the patent does not claim,” and (2) the brand submits “patent information” to the FDA that misstates the patent's scope, requiring “correct[ion]. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:34 am by Mandelman
Okay, I’m not going to stop you at paragraph #1, but it nothing about the first part of this sentence is technically correct. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am by Michael O'Hear
  First, the Commission should determine whether the amended guideline does a better job than the previous version of achieving just deserts (proportionality). [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:29 pm
Argument "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:41 pm by Mandelman
 Here they are verbatim, as presented in their final report, followed by my brief commentary in blue type: 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:30 pm by Rick
And despite knowing that had happened, the head of the District Attorney’s office decided he should stand trial again for murder. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Rick
I could add a third: If not, why does it seem so? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
Novo Nordisk A/SDocket: 10-844Issue(s): Whether the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act applies when (1) there is “an approved method of using the drug” that “the patent does not claim,” and (2) the brand submits “patent information” to the FDA that misstates the patent's scope, requiring “correct[ion]. [read post]