Search for: "John Doe Companies 1 - 100" Results 521 - 540 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2012, 3:13 am by Mandelman
   The SEC would be all over a public company that played by FHA’s rules. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Consider two examples: Example 1 Company TC is 51% owned by JM with the balance of its shares owned by a diverse group of public stockholders. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Secondly, it is equally obvious that BCL §623(g) is a provision of the Business Corporation Law, while LLCL §1005(b) is a provision of the Limited Liability Company Law, and that all of the companies that are parties to this litigation are limited liability companies and, thus, subject to the provisions of the latter statute. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Secondly, it is equally obvious that BCL §623(g) is a provision of the Business Corporation Law, while LLCL §1005(b) is a provision of the Limited Liability Company Law, and that all of the companies that are parties to this litigation are limited liability companies and, thus, subject to the provisions of the latter statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Victoria VanBuren
The survey reveals that two-thirds of respondents have been involved in them,1 and only 12% find them inappropriate. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
"           More money spent on judicial elections, it is feared, will give rise to the impression that justice is for sale very much reminiscent of John Grisham's book, "The Appeal," wherein a billionaire CEO buys himself a state supreme court justice who rules in favor of his company on an appeal. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
At the outset, this Court notes that the advisory opinions of the Committee on Open Government (which were inconsistent here and upon which both sides thus rely to various extents) are “neither binding upon the agency nor entitled to greater deference in an article 78 proceeding than is the construction of the agency” itself (John P. v Whalen, 54 NY2d 89, 96 [1981]; see Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:04 am by Legal Beagle
Handwriting expert John McCrae compared specimen signatures and was 99.99 per cent sure that those on the will were not genuine. [read post]