Search for: "John Does 1-10 " Results 521 - 540 of 4,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 9:40 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 2:11-cv-03700) alleged violations of the Lanham Act and the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, along with common law claims of unjust enrichment and unfair competition, arising from sarcastic false tweets under the tag @coventryfirst. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-25 (Case No. 2:10-cv-1275-DAK) cited First Amendment safeguards for unidentified environmental advocates who used the Internet to perpetrate a media hoax on plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc., as the basis for dismissing the company's lawsuit against the anonymous jokesters.In an 18-page memorandum of decision and order, U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
" Four of the five faculty member plaintiffs filed the suit as "John Does," alleging that they fear serious negative career consequences if identified. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:46 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-100, Case No. 687191) and subpoenaed the daily newspaper and its Website for the identities of 11 anonymous bloggers because he wanted to learn more about the specific complaints of the pseudonymous posters. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
The use of those posts, Trump said, conflicted with the court’s July 1 decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 1:16 am by Jack Bogdanski
Department of Justice who represented the officer blamed the chaos of that evening and said the deputy marshal – identified only as John Doe 1 – used “reasonable and privileged” force and blamed the incident on the gas mask the officer wore, and argued that it made it difficult to aim the launcher when the officer fired at LaBella.There's plenty of documentary evidence of the whole horrible incident. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am by Will Baude
  Again, in 1876, members of Congress by a probable 10-15 to 1 ratio thought the President was an officer of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 9:38 pm
The hearing starts at 10:00 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2007. [read post]