Search for: "John Elwood" Results 521 - 540 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 9:07 am
The Governor's single-minded approach to resolving the state's fiscal crisis reminds me of this exchange from the John Belushi-Dan Ackroyd classic "The Blues Brothers": Elwood: What kind of music do you usually have here? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:46 am by James Bickford
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood looks at the restrictions on briefs that can be filed by recent government employees. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
For a run-down of the many important cases that were relisted after last Friday’s conference (and thus are getting a closer look from the justices), see John Elwood’s latest Relist Watch column. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am by Kiera Flynn
 SCOTUSblog’s own Lyle Denniston covered the case (as well as a related petition) here, and SCOTUSblog’s John Elwood has additional coverage here. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:58 pm by Mike Rappaport
As John Elwood writes,  "under this procedure, the Senate 'gavels in' briefly every three days, calls the house to order, and ordinarily gavels right back out without conducting any business. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
”  [Disclosure:  John Elwood, a frequent contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to Anthony Elonis. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Judging from the Twitter reactions of multiple Supreme Court practitioners and commentators, the most appealing element of the update – what John Elwood called a “tantalizing glimpse” – may be the light at the end of this newly-opened tunnel. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:50 am by Josh Blackman
John Elwood provides the breakdown: (rescheduled before the Mar. 15, Mar. 22, Mar. 28, Apr. 12, Apr. 19, Apr. 26 and May 9 conferences; relisted after the May 16, May 23, May 30, June 6 and June 13 conferences) Seven reschedules and five relists! [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Recall our own John Elwood has also taken the opposite view. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 pm by Kedar
Several commentators, most notably John Elwood on Volokh Conspiracy and Tony Mauro for the Legal Times, have considered the possible reasons and consequences of the Court’s rather delinquent decision. earlier this year I took a look at the cases from OT07 that took longer-than-expected and the stats generally support what the pundits have said. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Adam Chandler
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood predicts which Justices are writing the outstanding decisions from the November and December sittings. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:16 pm by Amy Howe
The justices agreed to decide two other cases, both of which John Elwood covered in more detail in his Relist Watch column on Wednesday: Cantero v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:40 am by Will Baude
(Thanks to John Elwood and Matt Hellman for comments on an earlier draft of this post.)The post Arthur D. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:49 am by Rory Little
§ 924(c), the “crime with a long name” as Rosemond’s counsel John Elwood noted). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
SECOND UPDATE: I just noticed John Elwood beat me to it. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Also at this blog, John Elwood looks at the cases that were relisted from last week’s Conference. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 9:36 pm
(Full disclosure: A few months ago, I provided a very small amount of assistance to co-blogger John Elwood, counsel of record for Elonis, in the Elonis case.) [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:40 am by Jack Goldsmith
  On this topic I recommend this op-ed by Bush OLC-ers Steve Bradbury and John Elwood. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, John Elwood breaks down a new memorandum from the Supreme Court clerk’s office “addressing cert-stage pleadings and the scheduling of cases for consideration at the court’s periodic conferences,” which explains “in detail a number of the court’s practices on cert-stage scheduling that in the past largely traveled by word of mouth. [read post]