Search for: "Jones v. Major"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Jones, 2015-Ohio-483 (Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution affords the same protection as the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States in felony cases.) [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
After a debate on the fine points of trespass law, Alito argues that it the majority opinion overlooks the main problem: the use of the device to monitor Jones’ movements over a month’s period of time. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
The majority opinion in Jones focused on whether there had been a “common-law trespass. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm
The panel majority opinion is an unusually important and weighty precedent given its status as the first appellate decision in the nation to apply Jones to GPS tracking via cell phones and severely undercuts the Jones decision by effectively limiting it to its facts. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 1:02 am
Under the cover of night, without a single word, the Supreme Court effectively extinguished Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:51 am
OTTAWA UNIVERSITY v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson’s “Footnote of the Day” highlights a “deep disagreement” between the majority and the dissent in Citizens United as to the meaning of footnote 26 of First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:27 pm
First, the Court might expand the physical spaces rationale from Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Jones, supra. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Conover and McGaw v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Every major media outlet covered the Court’s much-anticipated decision in AT&T v. [read post]
